法國(guó)開發(fā)署貸款陜西省寶雞市鳳翔區(qū)東湖雍城湖濕地治理項(xiàng)目（考古遺址與自然景觀保護(hù)與發(fā)展）第5包：博物館建筑群總包（初步設(shè)計(jì)+施工圖設(shè)計(jì)+施工+采購(gòu)）（重新招標(biāo)）評(píng)標(biāo)結(jié)果公示

 

項(xiàng)目名稱：法國(guó)開發(fā)署貸款陜西省寶雞市鳳翔區(qū)東湖雍城湖濕地治理項(xiàng)目（考古遺址與自然景觀保護(hù)與發(fā)展）第5包：博物館建筑群總包（初步設(shè)計(jì)+施工圖設(shè)計(jì)+施工+采購(gòu)）（重新招標(biāo)）

招標(biāo)編號(hào)： 0733-23090492

選擇方法：技術(shù)標(biāo)與財(cái)務(wù)標(biāo)綜合評(píng)估

業(yè)主名稱：寶雞市鳳翔區(qū)林業(yè)局

招標(biāo)代理：中信國(guó)際招標(biāo)有限公司

 

一、評(píng)標(biāo)情況：

1. 投標(biāo)人名稱：中交建筑集團(tuán)有限公司、中國(guó)航空規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)研究總院有限公司聯(lián)合體 

技術(shù)綜合得分：0.58分

財(cái)務(wù)綜合得分：0.34分

綜合得分：0.92分

投標(biāo)報(bào)價(jià)（不含稅/歐元）：30,484,997.95

評(píng)標(biāo)價(jià)（不含稅/歐元）：30,484,997.95

未中標(biāo)理由：實(shí)質(zhì)性響應(yīng)招標(biāo)文件要求，但綜合得分排名第二。

2. 投標(biāo)人名稱：陜西建工第一建設(shè)集團(tuán)有限公司與重慶大學(xué)建筑規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)研究總院有限公司聯(lián)合體

技術(shù)綜合得分：0.65分

財(cái)務(wù)綜合得分：0.35分

綜合得分：1分

投標(biāo)報(bào)價(jià)（不含稅/歐元）：29,973,953.15

評(píng)標(biāo)價(jià)（不含稅/歐元）：29,973,953.15

中標(biāo)理由：實(shí)質(zhì)性響應(yīng)招標(biāo)文件要求，且綜合得分最高。

3. 投標(biāo)人名稱：中國(guó)建筑第六工程局有限公司、中國(guó)建筑上海設(shè)計(jì)研究院有限公司

技術(shù)綜合得分：/

財(cái)務(wù)綜合得分：/

綜合得分：/

投標(biāo)報(bào)價(jià)（不含稅/歐元）：/

評(píng)標(biāo)價(jià)（不含稅/歐元）：/

未中標(biāo)理由：根據(jù)招標(biāo)文件第一章第4.2款的規(guī)定：“投標(biāo)人不應(yīng)存在利益沖突，發(fā)現(xiàn)存在利益沖突的任何投標(biāo)人均不合格......”和招標(biāo)文件第二章 ITB 4.2的規(guī)定：“2）......其中本合同包的潛在投標(biāo)人若與本項(xiàng)目第1包總體方案設(shè)計(jì)包（除大遺址）的中標(biāo)人（包括聯(lián)合體牽頭方和成員方）直接或間接的共同處于他人控制之下，則被視為利益沖突。”（詳見補(bǔ)遺（三）），評(píng)標(biāo)委員會(huì)經(jīng)討論后一致認(rèn)為，該投標(biāo)人與本項(xiàng)目第1包總體方案設(shè)計(jì)包（除大遺址）中標(biāo)人之間存在利益沖突，不能滿足招標(biāo)文件第三章 評(píng)標(biāo)和資格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)“2.資格要求”1.合格性中的“1.2 利益沖突”的要求，因此不能通過(guò)資格審查。并根據(jù)招標(biāo)文件第二章ITB14.1&14.2規(guī)定：“投標(biāo)人應(yīng)滿足第三章的資格要求。在對(duì)技術(shù)投標(biāo)文件和投標(biāo)報(bào)價(jià)進(jìn)行評(píng)審之前，應(yīng)當(dāng)先對(duì)投標(biāo)人資格進(jìn)行評(píng)審。不滿足“第三章評(píng)標(biāo)和資格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”的投標(biāo)人其投標(biāo)將被拒絕。”。綜上，該投標(biāo)人未能通過(guò)資格審查，投標(biāo)被拒絕。

 

 

二、中標(biāo)人及合同授予情況：

 

三、提出異議的渠道和方式：

各投標(biāo)人或其他利害關(guān)系人如對(duì)以上公示結(jié)果存有異議，請(qǐng)?jiān)诒卷?xiàng)目公示期結(jié)束前，即自本結(jié)果發(fā)出起三（3）個(gè)日歷日內(nèi)（至2023年9月28日午夜止），以書面形式（投標(biāo)授權(quán)代表簽字并加蓋公章）將相關(guān)異議提交至業(yè)主單位和招標(biāo)代理公司（聯(lián)系方式如下）。

 

業(yè)主單位：寶雞市鳳翔區(qū)林業(yè)局

聯(lián)系人：李紅英

地址：陜西省寶雞市鳳翔區(qū)雍城大道中段

電話：+86-917-7219650

郵箱：bjsfxqxmb@126.com

 

招標(biāo)代理公司：中信國(guó)際招標(biāo)有限公司

聯(lián)系人：楊庚旭、郭欣悅

地址：北京市海淀區(qū)中關(guān)村南大街1號(hào)友誼賓館蘇園17單元四層

電話：+86-10-68946709

郵箱：yanggx@biddingcitic.com, guoxy@biddingcitic.com

 

  中信國(guó)際招標(biāo)有限公司

                                 二〇二三年九月二十五日

 

 

 

Announcement of Bid Evaluation Results of Lot 05: Museum complex EPC (preliminary design + construction drawing design+ construction + procurement)（Rebidding）of Dong Lake & Yongcheng Lake Wetland Restoration Project of Fengxiang District, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province (Protection and Development of the Archaeological and Natural Site) Financed by Agence Française de Développement

 

Project Name: Dong Lake & Yongcheng Lake Wetland Restoration Project of Fengxiang District, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province (Protection and Development of the Archaeological and Natural Site) Financed by Agence Française de Développement Lot 05: Museum complex EPC (preliminary design + construction drawing design+ construction + procurement)（Rebidding）

IPC No.: 0733-23090492

Selection method: Evaluation of Combined Technical and Financial Bids

Employer: Fengxiang District Forestry Bureau of Baoji City

Procurement Agent: CITIC International Tendering Co., Ltd

 

I. Evaluation Situation:

1. Name of the Bidder: Consortium of CCCC Construction Group Co., Ltd. and China Aviation Planning and Design Institute (Group) Co., Ltd. 

Technical Comprehensive Score: 0.58 points

Financial Comprehensive Score: 0.34 points

Comprehensive Score: 0.92 points

Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): 30,484,997.95

Evaluated Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): 30,484,997.95

Reasons for why not selected: The bid is substantially responsive but the comprehensive score ranked second.

2. Name of the Bidder: Consortium of the SCEGC No.1 Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd. and Research Institute of Architectural & Planning, Design Co., Ltd, Chongqing University

Technical Comprehensive Score: 0.65 points

Financial Comprehensive Score: 0.35 points

Comprehensive Score: 1 point

Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): 29,973,953.15

Evaluated Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): 29,973,953.15

Reasons for why selected: The bid is substantially responsive and got the highest comprehensive score.

3. Name of the Bidder: China Construction Sixth Engineering Bureau Corporation Limited and China Shanghai Architectural Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd.

Technical Comprehensive Score: /

Financial Comprehensive Score: /

Comprehensive Score: /

Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): /

Evaluated Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): /

Reasons for why not selected: As specified in 4.2 in Section I of the bidding documents, “A Bidder shall not have a conflict of interest. Any Bidder found to have a conflict of interest shall be disqualified......”. As specified in ITB 4.2 in Section II of the bidding documents, “2) ......If a potential bidder of Lot 05 and the successful bidder (including the leading party and any member party of the JV) of Lot 01: Global programming for the whole project (except archaeological sites programming) of this Project are directly or indirectly under the control of a third party, it will be considered as a conflict of interest” (see Addendum (III)). Through discussion, the bid evaluation committee concluded that the Bidder has a conflict of interest with the successful bidder of Lot 01: Global programming for the whole project (except archaeological sites programming) of this Project. Therefore, the Bidder can not meet the requirements of “1.2 Conflict of Interest” in “1. Eligibility” in “2. Qualification Requirements” in Section III - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria and thus fail to pass the qualification examination. And according to ITB 14.1&14.2 in Section II of the bidding documents, “Bidders shall meet qualification requirements specified in “Section III - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria”. Bidder’s qualification shall be evaluated before evaluation of the technical part of bid and the bid price. Bids which are not compliant with the requirements of Section III shall be rejected.” Based on the above mentioned, the Bidder failed to pass the qualification examination and its bid is rejected.

II. The Successful Bidder and Contract Award Information:

 

III. Channels and Methods for Raising Objections:

If any bidder or other interested party has any objections to the above publicity results, please submit the relevant objections in writing (signed by the authorized bid representative and stamped with the official seal) to the Employer and Procurement Agent (contact information is as follows) within three (3) calendar days (until midnight on September 28, 2023) from the issuance of this result before the end of the publicity period of this project.

 

Employer: Fengxiang District Forestry Bureau of Baoji City

Attention: Ms. Li Hongying

Address: Middle section of Yongcheng Avenue, Fengxiang District, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province

Telephone: +86-917-7219650

Email: bjsfxqxmb@126.com

 

Procurement Agent: CITIC International Tendering Co., Ltd.

Attention: Mr. Yang Gengxu, Ms. Guo Xinyue

Address: 4/F, No.17th Unit, Su Yuan, Beijing Friendship Hotel, Haidian District, Beijing

Telephone:+86-10-68946709

Email: yanggx@biddingcitic.com, guoxy@biddingcitic.com

 

CITIC International Tendering Co., Ltd.    

September 25, 2003